The AI video generation space has five major competitors as of February 2026. Each model excels in different areas, and the best choice depends on your specific use case and priorities.
| Seedance 2.0 | Sora 2 | Veo 3.1 | Kling 3.0 | Hailuo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Max resolution | 2K | 1080p | 4K | 1080p | 1080p |
| Max duration | 15s | 10s | 8s | 12s | 10s |
| Frame rate | 24 FPS | 24 FPS | 24 FPS | 60 FPS | 24 FPS |
| Text input | |||||
| Image input | Up to 9 | ||||
| Video input | Up to 3 clips | Limited | |||
| Audio input | Up to 3 files | ||||
| Native audio output | Yes (lip sync) | ||||
| Reference control | @tag system | Limited | Limited | Moderate | Limited |
When to choose each model
Seedance 2.0Best when you have existing reference material (photos, clips, audio) and want the most control over how references influence the output. Also the top choice for multilingual lip sync and workflows combining multiple input types.
Sora 2Best when physics accuracy matters most. Produces the most physically plausible interactions, object collisions, and real world dynamics among current generators.
Veo 3.1Best when you need the highest visual fidelity and cinematic quality. Leads in 4K output and broadcast grade aesthetics, making it the top choice for film and advertising production.
Kling 3.0Best when smooth motion and high frame rates are priorities. 60 FPS output and strong human motion rendering make it ideal for dance, sports, and action content.
HailuoBest as a cost effective option for simpler text to video workflows where multimodal inputs are not needed.