Operator vs Other Web Browsing Agents

All options1 min read
OpenAI OperatorAnthropic Computer UseGoogle MarinerTraditional RPA
ApproachScreenshot + virtual mouse/keyboardScreenshot + virtual mouse/keyboardChrome extension with DOM accessCoded workflows with selectors
ScopeWeb browsing focusedFull desktop (any application)Chrome browser onlyWeb and desktop
Input methodNatural languageNatural languageNatural languageProgrammed scripts
Browser environmentIsolated (own browser)Depends on implementationYour Chrome browserConfigurable
Partner integrationsYes (DoorDash, Instacart, etc.)Google ecosystemEnterprise connectors
Pricing$20/mo (Plus) or APIAPI usage basedIncluded with Gemini$500+/mo enterprise
ReliabilityVariable (AI based)Variable (AI based)Variable (AI based)High (deterministic)
Best forConsumer web tasks, shopping, bookingDeveloper agent building, general automationGoogle users, Chrome workflowsEnterprise, mission critical processes

Benchmark performance comparison (OSWorld)

O
BEST

Operator (CUA)

38.1%

C

Claude Computer Use

22.0%

G

Google Mariner

~15%

4

GPT-4V (baseline)

12.2%

Bottom line

Operator is the most consumer friendly web browsing agent, with partner integrations that make shopping and booking tasks reliable. Anthropic Computer Use is better for developers who need a general purpose desktop agent via API. Google Mariner has the advantage of running in your existing Chrome browser with your sessions. Traditional RPA remains the best choice for mission critical enterprise automation where reliability is non negotiable. The space is evolving rapidly; all major AI companies are investing heavily in agent capabilities.