Jules vs Claude Code vs OpenAI Codex vs GitHub Copilot

All plans1 min read
JulesClaude CodeOpenAI CodexGitHub Copilot
TypeAsync cloud agentTerminal agentCloud agentIDE extension
ExecutionCloud VM (async)Local machine (real time)Cloud sandbox (async)Local (extension)
Starting priceFree (15 tasks/day)$20/mo (Pro) or API$20/mo (ChatGPT Pro)$10/mo (Individual)
Powered byGemini 3 Flash / ProClaude modelsOpenAI models (o3, GPT-4.1)OpenAI models
Interaction modelSubmit and forgetReal time terminalSubmit and reviewInline suggestions + chat
Proactive featuresYes (suggested, scheduled, CI fix)
Critic agentYes (built in)
Git integrationGitHub native (issues, PRs, comments)Deep (commits, PRs, branches)GitHub (auto PRs)GitHub native
Local file accessNo (cloud only)No (cloud only)
CLI / APIYes (both)Yes (CLI)Codex CLI (open source)Limited
ExtensibilityAGENTS.md, APIMCP, hooks, agents, skillsAGENTS.mdExtensions, plugins

AI coding agents compared

When to choose Jules

Jules is the strongest choice when you want a free, fire and forget coding agent that delivers pull requests asynchronously. Its proactive features (suggested tasks, scheduled maintenance, CI fixer) are unmatched by any competitor. Choose Jules for background task delegation, automated code maintenance, and teams that want AI contributions to flow through the standard GitHub PR review process. Choose Claude Code if you need real time interaction, local file access, and maximum extensibility. Choose Codex if you are already in the ChatGPT ecosystem and want cloud execution with OpenAI models.

Combining Jules with other tools

Jules is not a replacement for your IDE or terminal agent. Many developers use Jules for background tasks (dependency upgrades, bug fixes, test writing) while using Claude Code or Cursor for interactive, real time coding. Jules handles the maintenance work that piles up in your backlog, freeing you to focus on creative, high value development with your preferred interactive tool.